Tackling Inequality Now
 
Sherri Torjman and Ken Battle, January 2012
 
These notes were prepared for the panel presentation on poverty and inequality organized in Ottawa on January 19, 2012, by Canada 2020.  The event was part of a larger project on The Canada We Want in 2020.  These notes draw from the paper Inequality Is Not Inevitable that Caledon contributed to The Canada We Want in 2020 volume.

ISBN - 1-55382-556-X


View full document in PDF format.

Copies of our publications are also available, upon request, in Microsoft Word format. Please contact the Caledon Institute for information.

HAVE YOU SEEN

-Welfare in Canada 2015 -Federal government must build conditions for young entrepreneurs’ success -Compassionate Care Benefits within Employment Insurance -‘Basic Income’ or ‘Bait and Switch’? -Disability Supports and Employment Policy -Strengthening Canada’s Public Employment Service Post-Devolution -Minimum Wage, Maximum Wager in Alberta -Using low income and material deprivation to monitor poverty reduction -Some thoughts on a National Housing Strategy -Innovation: counting what counts -Canada Pension Plan: The New Deal -Risks and rewards of the sharing economy -Long-Term Commitment for Long-Term Care -The Labour Market Agreements: What Did They Really Do? -When is a dollar more than a dollar? -The Canada Child Benefit Needs to be Fully Indexed to Inflation -Welfare in Canada, 2014 -May 19, 2016: Michael Mendelson Addresses the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology on changes to the Employment Insurance program in the 2016 federal Budget -Video - Data Rescue -Video - Sherri Torjman: Five Good Ideas about Policy -Video - Sherri Torjman: Canada@150 address -Video - Sherri Torjman: Shared Space & Community Recreation -

‘Basic Income’ or ‘Bait and Switch’?

Michael Mendelson, October 13, 2016

The idea of a Basic Income is much in vogue these days, but is one name being used to describe two different programs? This paper describes a ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Basic Income design to show why we might want the former, but could well end up with the latter

More >