‘Basic Income’ or ‘Bait and Switch’?
Michael Mendelson, October 2016
The idea of a Basic Income is much in vogue these days, but is one name being used to describe two different programs? This paper describes a ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Basic Income design to show why we might want the former, but could well end up with the latter. While the search for the silver bullet to once and for all eliminate poverty in a single great swoop is seductive, it leads us away from consideration of practical steps which, while incremental, would substantially reduce poverty and inequality.

ISBN - 1-55382-678-7

View full document in PDF format.

Copies of our publications are also available, upon request, in Microsoft Word format. Please contact the Caledon Institute for information.


-Caledon Institute Welcomes the New National Housing Strategy -Welfare in Canada, 2016 -Caledon praises Federal Economic Statement -What does an actual housing allowance look like? Manitoba’s Rent Assist program -A Renewed Voice for Social Canada -It's time to tear down the "welfare wall" for persons with disabilities -Why core housing need is a poor metric to measure outcomes of Canada's national housing strategy -National Child Data Strategy: Results of a Feasibility Study -Dismantling the Welfare Wall for Persons with Disabilities -The 2017 Farewell Budget -Poverty Reduction and Disability Income -May 19, 2016: Michael Mendelson Addresses the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology on changes to the Employment Insurance program in the 2016 federal Budget -Video - Data Rescue -Video - Sherri Torjman: Five Good Ideas about Policy -Video - Sherri Torjman: Canada@150 address -Video - Sherri Torjman: Shared Space & Community Recreation -